Article Details

Abstract

Production equipment is an important foundation for the required energy consumption and the produced carbon emissions in the production process. There are significant differences in energy consumption and carbon emissions during the production of the same product using different equipment. The traditional method of selecting equipment can only provide a qualitative comparison of advantages and disadvantages, which is difficult to meet the quantitative requirements of resource conservation and pollution reduction. To address this issue, this paper proposes a unified calculation method for energy consumption and carbon emissions targets of multiple types of equipment in the product production process, and establishes a unified mathematical model for energy consumption and carbon emissions in the production process, providing a basis for quantitatively identifying differences between different equipment targets. The improved Grey Wolf Optimizer is used to calculate the optimal target values of energy consumption and carbon emissions of various equipment for producing the same product. Taking the machining holes as an example, the verification results show that the production equipment selected according to the model can save energy consumption by 4.2% and reduce carbon emissions by 9.2%. The model can help enterprises choose energy-saving and low-carbon production equipment in the production process.

Keywords

production process; energy-saving and low-carbon; equipment selection; improved Grey Wolf Optimizer

References

1. [1] ZHAI X Q，AN Y F. Analyzing Influencing Factors of Green Transformation in China'S Manufacturing Industry Under Environmental Regulation: A Structural Equation Model [J/OL].Journal of Cleaner Production，2020，251：119760.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S095965261934630X?via%3Dihub.
2. [2] AI X F，JIANG Z G，ZHANG H，et al. Low-Carbon Product Conceptual Design from the Perspectives of Technical System and Human Use [J/OL].Journal of Cleaner Production，2020，244：118819.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118819.
3. [3] CHIRAG M，YUAN J，DEBANGSU B. Techno-Economic Optimization of Shale gas to Dimethyl ETher Production Processes via Direct and Indirect Synthesis Routes [J].Applied. Energy，2019，238：119–134.
4. [4] GAURAV J，SOREN S，KAPIL D M. Life Cycle Assessment of Sintering Process for Carbon Footprint and Cost Reduction: A Comparative Study for coke and Biomass-Derived Sintering Process [J/OL].Journal of Cleaner Production，2020，259：120889[2024-04-23]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120889.
5. [5] Zhang Hua, Liu Fei, Li Youru Decision Model and Application Case Study of Green Process Planning [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2000 (9): 28-31+5
6. [6] Cao Huajun, Liu Fei, He Yan Model and Application of Machine Tool Equipment Selection for Green Manufacturing [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2004 (3): 26-30
7. [7] Li Lianhui, Xu Guanying, Gao Yang Evaluation of Product Processing Technology Planning Scheme for Green Manufacturing [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 30 (17): 2100-2107
8. [8] Guo Xiangyu, Wang Lin, Zhang Yongjian Machine processing planning based on immune genetic algorithm under rule constraints [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 31 (4): 482-488
9. [9] Zhou Tao, Wang Yongchao, Li Wenjun, etc Green process scheme decision-making based on interval number TOPSIS method [J]. Combination Machine Tool and Automation Processing Technology, 2022 (1): 160-163
10. [10] Zhang Chen, Zhou Laishui, An Luling, etc Research on Optimization of Numerical Control Milling Processing Parameters Based on Simulation [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2007 (24): 2955-2960+2964
11. [11] Liu Qiong, Zhou Yingdong, Zhang Yi Integrated optimization of cutting parameters and scheduling for low-carbon [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2017, 53 (5): 24-33
12. [12] XIAO Y M，JIANG Z G，GU Q，et al. A Novel Approach to CNC Machining Center Processing Parameters Optimization Considering Energy-saving and Low-Cost [J].Journal of Manufacturing Systems，2021，59：535-548.
13. [13] Yan Jihong, Li Lin A machining parameter optimization method based on a general cutting energy consumption model: CN 201510786014.5 [P]: 2015-11-16
14. [14] Li Congbo, Cui Longguo, Liu Fei, etc Multi objective optimization model for CNC machining parameters oriented towards high efficiency and low carbon [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 49 (9): 87-96
15. [15] TU Q，CHEN X C，LIU X C. Hierarchy Strengthened Grey Wolf Optimizer for Numerical Optimization and Feature Selection [J].IEEE Access，2019，7：78012-78028.
16. [16] ZHANG G J，LI H，XIAO C Y，et al. Multi-Aspect Analysis and Multi-Objective Optimization of a Novel Biomass-Driven Heat and Power Cogeneration System; Utilization of Grey Wolf Optimizer [J].Journal of cleaner production，2022，355：1-20.

Funding

Guizhou Province 2022 Higher Education Teaching Content and Curriculum System Reform Project (2022331)

About the authors

Xiao Yongmao (1983-), male, Han ethnicity, from Cangzhou, Hebei Province, associate professor, PhD, research direction: green manufacturing, manufacturing systems engineering.